I know mine to be a minority viewpoint in this regard, yet I hold to it nevertheless:
Religious indoctrination in youth
Is the best predictor
For apostasy and atheism in adult life.
The evidence for that is little short of conclusive. Saying so shocked a great many of my Catholic readers. I put it into the mouth of my most popular character:
“What has the typical response to indoctrination been, Father? What percentage of the children that have passed through parochial schools remain communicants as adults? Do we really need any other explanation for why the schools are closing down at such a rate?”
The priest grinned without humor. “Don’t you think the property tax situation might have had something to do with it, Louis? To say nothing of the problems the Church has had with zoning boards all over the country?”
Louis shook his head. “That’s nothing new. The American Church has faced those forces for three centuries. It’s only in the last fifty years that our numbers have diminished this way. And we’re mostly to blame for it.”
He scowled. “It was always a mistake, you know. Religion isn’t for children, and to impose it on them by force has never been to anyone’s greater good.”
…though that didn’t assuage the feelings of the many who were appalled by it.
There are several reasons for this, but one stands above the rest: the behavior of adults. Adults seldom realize how closely their children watch them and analyze their behavior. Any behavioral departure from the norms they preach will cause their kids to think hypocrite! In the juvenile mind, that has severe consequences.
Parents cannot afford hypocrisy when and where their kids might detect it. If you tell them that God is watching, you must act accordingly. If you teach them the Ten Commandments, or the all-encompassing Two Great Commandments, you must take care that your children never see you violate them. Should you slip and be caught, you must confess your fault – to your kids — and promise them that you’ll strive to do better from then on.
But how many parents can honestly claim to have upheld that standard?
To a child… and, tragically, to the adult he will become… hypocrisy equates to the negation of the violated stricture: “They say one thing but do another, so how can what they say be true or important? Ignore it!” Even later in life, when the adult who developed from that disappointed, disillusioned child acquires enough experience of Mankind to understand that we are fallen, he will be reluctant to revisit the faith he rejected. Rare is the man who’s happy to admit that he was insufficiently mature to understand his parents, especially in their weaknesses… even if they’re weaknesses he shares.
So when I read something like this:
As all of you know, I am not a believer in any sort of deity. I guess that’s odd, being that I grew up in a Catholic household and was sent to a Christian private school for three years. My parents were hoping that the experience would help. It didn’t. All my experiences with organized religion did was make me believe that the people in the churches were mostly lying hypocrites.
… I want to weep for what the writer has denied himself. His pride will probably be involved. No one likes to admit to error, even the sort of error that’s understandable from a child. The more a man thinks of himself – justly or otherwise – the less likely he’ll be to make such an admission.
There is nothing in the universe that compares to the knowledge that there is a God who loves us and wants us to be with Him in Paradise. It’s not provable by secular standards of proof. Yet secularists accept many far more questionable propositions on far less evidence. They who refuse to ponder the possibility have denied themselves a comfort of inestimable magnitude, great enough to cushion the most savage of blows. I pity them.
“Christianity, if false, is of no importance, and if true, of infinite importance; the only thing it cannot be is moderately important.” – C. S. Lewis.
Enjoy your Holy Week, and may God bless and keep you all.
10 comments
Skip to comment form
Graduated from a Catholic HS 50+ years ago. Have only seen a couple dozen classmates at Sunday Mass in all those years.
It is possible to advocate and encourage an ideal without being able to live up that ideal. After all, “Perfection is a journey, not a destination.”
Author
Neal Stephenson said so in The Diamond Age:
I can’t improve on that.
He can improve on it though. “The spirit is willing but the flesh is weak.” Granted slightly different context, but…
We didn’t resume attendance until my kids asked. (I suspect both sets of grandparents had a hand in that.) I think they were 12 and 10 at the time. They both embraced and retained it a whole more more readily than I did, who had weekly Sunday School as far back as I recall.
I’m not Catholic. However, the hypocrisy of the members of churches we were taken to when growing up resulted in my brother and I both being wary of modern Christianity. While he hasn’t been a member of a church in decades, I have and found that most sound more like the world than what Jesus preached. I left the latest one because the weekly message revolved around “diversity is our strength.”
In any church, if you look at the people you will always be disappointed. That does not diminish the teachings of Jesus. Find a church where Jesus is the only focus (they exist) and look to Jesus and you won’t be disappointed. If you are, check the mirror.
I was raised Protestant, hit an Atheistic phase in high school, and then fell in with a bunch of Pagans. I’ve come to the conclusion that one cannot organize a religion without introducing hypocrisy. So I look for spirituality in others.
Mankind created gods to answer burning questions about the unseen. I’ve decided that we are all reflections of the Divine, similar to light shining through a crystal – all different with an underlying similarity and relationship.
Religion gives a succinct vocabulary to relate the concepts.
Author
Don’t imagine that all those whose behavior disappoints by deviating from the creed they claim to practice are willing hypocrites. Mankind is fallible. We’re in imperfect control of our appetites, our impulses… ourselves! How many of us can even claim to have fulfilled all the promises we’ve made? Try to remember what Jesus of Nazareth said about judging others:
Words to live by, dude!
A charge of “hypocrisy” is and always has been an easy out for people who find themselves disinclined to restrain their behavior. Since it is impossible for fallen humans to be perfect, there can never be a perfect follower of Jesus. Or Mao, or Stalin, or you-name it/him/her. So if one wishes to find an excuse to fall away from the creed that governs any particular institution, faith, religion, or what-have-you, finding an example of “hypocrisy” and using it to justify one’s own proclivities is easy as pie. It is also cowardly and in the case of Christianity, it will not avail against eternal damnation. When a skeptic rails against the “unfairness” of God “sending someone to hell,” what the skeptic fails to realize is that it is the person who sends himself or herself there by failing to avail of the way of redemption and salvation offered by Jesus, whose way is easy and burden light. Jesus told us how to find eternal rest and peace; follow Him! Accept His Lordship and believe in His divinity. That is the choice that He has given us; He is either a liar, a lunatic or He is what He claims to be, namely the Son of God Almighty and part of the Triune Godhead. That is the rather stark choice outlined by, among many, C.S.Lewis. I simultaneously am amused by and sorrow for those who claim to reject Jesus in favor of some other “god” they concoct to suit their particular tastes. You know, the “not religious but spiritual” crowd who blithely think that their mental gymnastics will be enough to give them respite from eternal separation from the God they decided to reject while here on Earth. Not so, I am afraid. Contrary to the belief that a perfectly loving God would never condemn anyone to eternal damnation, it is precisely because God is perfectly loving that He will not impose His will on an unbeliever and coerce belief. No, He allows each of us the freedom to choose, and by our choosing, to set our path toward His eternal home or away from it. To decide that fate on the basis of what one perceives to be some “hypocrisy” on the part of believers is to make the most important decision of one’s life stand or fall on the behavior of some other fallible and imperfect human being. Hardly a postion that is likely to foster a successful outcome.
Calling others hypocrites has long been a way of assuaging the guilty consciences of the wayward cynic. One of the downsides to cynicism is arriving at the conclusion every one, especially the smart one, is doing it. Believing they’d be the only fool doing the right thing wounds their pride. The self-esteem indoctrination in schools only made matters worse.