…when this came along.
(Thank you, Adrienne.)
The whole article is worth your attention – your careful attention. Don’t accept it uncritically. Think about it, ask yourself (and others) why governments would want to depopulate their own jurisdictions, and whether the means proposed by Dr. Yeadon is a plausible method. Ask also whether there might be other motivations that don’t involve mass death: for instance, the imposition of a scheme of total control and monitoring over all movement and interaction of all humans everywhere, in perpetuity.
In that connection, the bit that intrigues me most comes here:
“I think the end game is going to be, ‘everyone receives a vaccine’… Everyone on the planet is going to find themselves persuaded, cajoled, not quite mandated, hemmed-in to take a jab.
“When they do that every single individual on the planet will have a name, or unique digital ID and a health status flag which will be ‘vaccinated,’ or not … and whoever possesses that, sort of single database, operable centrally, applicable everywhere to control, to provide as it were, a privilege, you can either cross this particular threshold or conduct this particular transaction or not depending on [what] the controllers of that one human population database decide. And I think that’s what this is all about because once you’ve got that, we become playthings and the world can be as the controllers of that database want it.
“For example, you might find that after a banking reset that you can only spend through using an app that actually feeds off this [database], your ID, your name, [and] your health status flag.”
“And, yes, certainly crossing an international border is the most obvious use for these vaccine passports, as they are called, but I’ve heard talk of them already that they could be necessary for you to get into public spaces, enclosed public spaces. I expect that if they wanted to, you would not be able to leave your house in the future without the appropriate privilege on your app.
The combination of coercion with fear and habituation could produce that outcome. When I correlate it with other recent developments – “smart” thermostats, electric power meters, and water meters; highway cameras that record license plates; facial recognition systems tied to ever more common CCTV systems; cellphones that continuously “check in” with the nearby cell towers; even “smart” face masks — a highly unpleasant picture begins to form.
Could it all be paranoiac hallucination, with no coordinated intent whatsoever behind all these separate developments? Of course. But could it be something much closer to reality? Something that’s been encroaching upon us for several decades? I shan’t speak for anyone else, but my policy is to assume and prepare for the worst. That way all my surprises will be pleasant ones.
My sincere apologies for disturbing your breakfast, but the possibilities deserve to be hauled out of the shadows and examined in the light. If those possibilities strike you as remotely plausible, a bit of resistance is called for, wouldn’t you say? Or would you prefer to sit back and assume that “the experts know best” and “the government only has our well-being in mind?”
[See also Ira Levin’s somewhat neglected novel This Perfect Day.]
As with so many events, the significant point is that they all fall in the same direction. No, it’s not necessarily the case that every new bit of technology and every new regulation was crafted to increase government control over our lives, but at some point Occam’s Razor crosses its arms and looks at things skeptically.
That’s my feeling as well, Steven. I’ve said on many occasions that “When all the errors are in the bank’s favor, you can be forgiven for thinking there’s more at work than sloppy arithmetic.” This is a case of that sort. But we’ll both be called delusional — possibly even public menaces — for even suggesting as much.
Could be subtitled “The Biotechnology and Psyops of the Death Cults.”
(chuckle) Well, yes, but I didn’t want to sound too screechy!
I think some guy exiled to the island of Patmos 2000 years ago wrote hints about something like this. As did another guy 600 years before him in Babylon. Truly, “there is nothing new under the sun.”
And if the rest of what those guys wrote is true, then we are in for one Hell of a ride. Literally.
It’s fixin’ to be revealed here any day now .
And he said, Go thy way, Daniel: for the words are closed up and sealed till the time of the end.
The boiling frog, it started for Americans losing their liberties when the TSA was enacted
I don’t recall in my lifetime anyone ever refusing cash for any item. Which alleviates many of the so called problems of, to jab or not to jab and its inherent consequences.
Cash is king, always has been, always will be. I would suggest everyone start using it for everything possible. Make your purchases local whenever possible or use an alternate means of paying for things when not possible, such as cashiers checks or money orders. This will greatly frustrate their intent of control of the populace and that is the main goal… Frustrate them so they will simply give up.
When the governed become ungovernable – let them heard cats….
Cash is indeed the best guarantor of privacy in financial matters. The federal government has been trying to come up with a bulletproof rationale for eliminating cash completely. Governments have always hated it when their citizens / subjects have managed to maintain any privacy in their dealings with one another. If they can eliminate cash, they’ll be on the way to complete power over all financial transactions, however large or small…and I have no doubt that they’ll keep trying.