Money is like matter and energy. That is, it obeys a law of continuity. Every dollar must come from somewhere and go to somewhere. Yea verily, even if the destination is an incinerator.
He who attempts to “launder” ill-gotten gains must respect that law. He must prepare to be called to account – plan for the worst, hope for the best, right? – and to have a plausible explanation for where his income came from, and for where it is at present. The IRS is only one of the snoopy agencies that will take critical note of any discrepancies in his money flow.
Which brings us to this bit of amusing news:
On the Schedule E portion of his 2017 tax forms, Joe Biden reported $19,800 in “rents received,” and none in 2018, according to information reported on Sunday by Breitbart’s Wendell Husebø.
But when filling out a background check, Hunter Biden claimed to pay a specific $49,910 rent each month to his dad from March 2017 to February 2018. This is the same home where classified documents were recently found stacked in the garage. Biden the Younger spent about a year — during part of his drugged-out times — renting (?) Biden the Elder’s Wilmington, Del., home following his divorce from Kathleen Biden.
That extraordinary monthly rent is clearly an attempt to launder the notorious “10% for the Big Guy.” All by itself, it indicates a subnormal mentality (to say nothing of a subnormal morality) in Biden the Younger. The relatively ordinary residence that Hunter Biden rented from “Big Guy” Joe would not command a $50,000 monthly rent no matter where in the world one might situate it – but in Wilmington, Delaware? It’s impossible to hold back the laughter.
But wait: there’s more! Compounding this lunatic attempt to provide a cover for the use of the Biden vice-presidency to solicit bribes, “Big Guy” Joe never reported the income as taxable! Whether he simply forgot about it or believed that his tax returns would never be closely examined, that’s a catastrophic error. Once the IRS notices an omission of that sort, it comes down on the hapless filer like One World Trade Center on 9/11.
Was the return audited? Who knows? That it’s come to light as filed makes me wonder whether the Democrat kingmakers kept it back as a measure of control over the famously erratic “Big Guy.” A criminal organization always retains methods of control over those who occupy its top slots. Ask the Soviets.
Yet another data point in support of my contention that the Democrats have become desperate to rid themselves of the Bidens and their ever-lengthening list of embarrassments to the party.