The following was culled from Facebook:

     I hope this guy’s life insurance is paid up. Imagine the kind of attention he’d get from homosexual activists were he publicly identified as the originator of this thesis. Yet it’s worth some thought – and an effort to find further evidence, whether “for” or “against.”


Skip to comment form

    • Old Dude on May 13, 2023 at 8:04 AM

    Interesting. There was another thread along this line, more following genetics and statistical analysis that the behavior could not be sustained if genetically encoded, as the gene, if existed, would die out naturally.

  1. Look for evidence, whether “for” or “against.” Don’t be misled by the analogous observation about rats and cats.

    1. Motives have no bearing on evidence, Pas. Besides, you’ve misinterpreted the parasites / rats / cats observation. Enough now!

    • Waidmann on May 13, 2023 at 11:46 AM

    I could be wrong here, but it sounds like someone is postulating an intelligence to these parasites  that I don’t think they have.  Unless there is a sub-thought (not stated) that there is a diabolical intelligence at work here.  On the nature/nurture debate, I tend to fall on both sides of the debate.  I lean towards believing male homosexuality is more nature while female homosexuality is entirely nurture.  But I’m not going to fall on my sword over the issue.  

    • Anon on May 15, 2023 at 2:36 AM

    That’s 4chan. /pol/ specifically.
    Worth a visit.
    You’ll be there forever.

Comments have been disabled.