Ingredients of the vaccines.

Jon Rappoport[1] provides a helpful link to a Centers for Disease Control webinar[2] that lists the ingredients in only the vaccines produced by Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna. I was curious and checked it out as I’d not seen any such list before:

Ingredients included in mRNA COVID-19 vaccines


mRNA nucleoside-modified mRNA encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2
Lipids 2[(polyethylene glycol)-2000]-N,Nditetradecylacetamide
Salts, sugars, buffers potassium chloride
monobasic potassium phosphate
sodium chloride
dibasic sodium phosphate dihydrate


mRNA nucleoside-modified mRNA encoding the viral spike (S) glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2
Lipids PEG2000-DMG: 1,2-dimyristoyl-rac-glycerol, methoxypolyethylene glycol
SM-102: heptadecan-9-yl 8-((2-hydroxyethyl) (6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy) hexyl) amino) octanoate
Salts, sugars, buffers Tromethamine
Tromethamine hydrochloride
Acetic acid
Sodium acetate

That all looks like an exercise in injecting Super Glue and jalapeno sauce in one’s very own muscles but maybe that’s just me. Anyway, the Health Desk site states, “No WHO authorized vaccines produced by Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, CanSino, Sinovac, Sputnik V, or Janssen contain graphene oxide. The Novavax COVID-19 vaccine has not yet published a list of its ingredients in a peer-reviewed or open access publication.”[3] So that’s a good thing. If you go for the experimental “vaccine” at least you don’t register on Air Force magnetometers.

Mr. Rappoport quotes from a 4/11/21 Cayman Chemical Company Safety Data Sheet (SDS) warning that SM-102 is “For research use only, not for human or veterinary use.” The SDS was revised four months later and now states that the product with the tradename SM-102 “is for research use – Not for human or veterinary diagnostic or therapeutic use.”[4] Rappoport elaborates on the danger to humans posed by a product with such an alarming SDS.

However, my general hostility to these “vaccines” that actually enter your cells and cause the production of the covid-19 spike protein notwithstanding, I wondered how a product with such an SDS could find its way into Moderna’s vaccine. Reading further I saw that section 3 of the SDS, “Composition/information on ingredients,” applies to a mixture of this chemical[5] (10%) and chloroform (90%) and it states that the dangerous component is the chloroform and that SM-102 itself is a “nonhazardous [addition].”

A 5/19/21 Cayman Press Release indicates that its SM-102 product is a research use only (RUO) product “intended only for in vitro [test tube experimentation] or animal (exploratory or preclinical) use.” However, it emphasizes that chloroform is a common solvent with several known serious hazards but that “Neither the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), Registry of Toxic Effects of Chemical Substances (RTECS), or [sic] the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) Classification and Labelling Inventory list [sic] any hazards associated with SM-102.[6]

So it appears that it’s the mixture with chloroform that’s so hazardous and that the actual chemical is one of four completely innocuous lipids used to provide a coating for the completely innocuous mRNA poison active component that allows it to enter the cell itself. As I understand it, much experimentation was done to find the precise mix of the four lipids that, when blasted at the mRNA and each other, create the requisite layer of scum fat for the mRNA to be able to invade enter the victim’s target’s peon’s patient’s very own cells.

Well, butter my buns and call me a biscuit if that doesn’t sound like a damn good idea.

[1] “Shocker: Why is this substance in the Moderna COVID vaccine?” By Jon Rappoport, Jon Rappoport’s Blog, 5/19/21.
[2] “COVID-19 Vaccines: Update on Allergic Reactions, Contraindications, and Precautions.” Clinician Outreach and Communication Activity (COCA) Webinar, Centers for Disease Control, 12/30/20, p.20.
[3] “How do we know graphene oxide isn’t used in COVID-19 mRNA vaccines?” By Health Desk, 8/4/21.
[4] “Safety Data Sheet acc. to OSHA HCS.” Cayman Chemical Company, 8/11/21, p. 1.
[5] 8-[(2-hydroxyethyl)[6-oxo-6-(undecyloxy)hexyl]amino]-octanoic acid, 1-octylnonyl ester is the Cayman rendering of the formal name of SM-102. It differs from the name for the chemical shown after “SM-102” in the table in the text above. I assume this is all the same chemical with the CAS number 2089251-47-6. I’m aware that there are sometimes different ways of spelling out the names of chemical formulas. The product description language is consistent with what is listed in the CDC document, to wit, “Formulations containing SM-102 have been used in the development of lipid nanoparticles for delivery of mRNA-based vaccines.”
[6] “SM-102 for Research Use Only (RUO).” Cayman Chemical Company, Press Release, 5/19/21 (emphasis in original).


    • George True on August 29, 2021 at 2:03 PM

    Researchers at the University of Almeria in Spain got their hands on a batch of the Pfizer vaccine and put it under an electron microscope.  They discovered that it does not just CONTAIN graphene oxide, IT IS 99% graphene oxide.  A number of supposedly scientific ‘fact checkers’ have attempted, unsuccessfully, to debunk the findings of the research team led by Dr. Pablo Campra of the University of Almeria.

    The vaccine is, quite literally, poison.

  1. Thanks very much. If you have a link I’d be very interested in following up on that.

  2. Mr. True, the University does not support the claim that any researchers there discovered graphene oxide in any vaccine:

    “These Spanish researchers have found that over 99 percent of the Pfizer vaccine is graphene oxide.”


    SOURCE: Jane Ruby, Stew Peters, Stew Peters Show, 5 Jul. 2021 (

    Unsupported: There is no evidence that the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine contains graphene. The only sample used in the study is of unknown origin and traceability. Lists of the vaccine’s ingredients released by Pfizer-BioNTech do not include graphene oxide. The analysis, done using electron microscopy, is also inconclusive.

    Misleading: These claims state that the analysis is an official study from the University of Almería. However, the university has “unequivocally” distanced itself from the analysis that claims to have found graphene oxide in a vial of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. The university also made it clear it doesn’t endorse the analysis.


    Claims that a study from the University of Almería, Spain, found graphene oxide in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, contain numerous inaccuracies. Firstly, the alleged vial of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine analyzed is of unknown origin and traceability. Secondly, the methodology used for the analysis, electron microscopy, is inconclusive. Thirdly, the list of ingredients in the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, which can be found in the vaccine’s package insert, don’t include graphene; these package inserts are rigorously reviewed by health authorities. Lastly, the analysis isn’t an official study from the University of Almería, which distanced itself from the analysis and its conclusions.

    See also to the same effect:

    Source notes “This false claim originated from: Facebook.”

Comments have been disabled.