Gee, I wonder why the Catholic Church is having a hard time keeping people?

I mean, with leaders like this, I would think virtuous Christians would be just breaking down the doors, right?

Cardinal Blase Cupich, the progressive Catholic Archbishop of Chicago, offered the invocation for the Democratic National Convention (DNC) Monday without ever mentioning Jesus Christ.

The DNC with it’s mobile abortion vans. The DNC with it’s proud push for every sin the Catholic Church claims to be against. The DNC who is openly hostile to any theology that calls for man to moderate himself.

And Cupich just walks in there and blesses all of it. Because you see, he really doesn’t believe in Christianity either.

I have nothing but contempt for Cupich. I wish he would convert to Catholicism, repent of his sins, and reunite with God. But I don’t think he has the capability. I don’t think he’ll ever admit that anyone or anything is more important than himself.

Remember, when you tell God to go away, he does. And nothing says “GO AWAY” to God more than murdering babies for your own convenience. The thing that Cupich just blessed. It’s positively Satanic.

People can see the hypocrisy. And so they stay home on Sunday morning.

Pie In The Sky By And By

     Given how many of us Baby Boomers there are, there’s always someone whose 50th anniversary of something has come around. And there are quite a few old rockers and folkies available to reminisce about their golden years. The combination can be cloying, if not worse.

     For example, not everyone’s memory of certain musical highlights is a glowing one.

     Just now, Don McLean – hey, remember Don McLean? No? Well, I guess you had to be there. – is somewhat in the entertainment rags for – drum roll, please – claiming that his big hit “American Pie” somewhat forecast our current troubles with “woke:”

     Don McLean has no time for what he describes as “woke bullshit,” adding that it’s the kind of societal issue he conveyed in his 1971 classic “American Pie.”
     “The song really does open up a whole historical question about what happened in the ’60s and assassinations and the history that forms the backbone of the song as it moves forward,” the rocker explained during a recent interview with Metro. “This song talks about the fact that things are going somewhat in the wrong direction, and I think that they’re still going in the wrong direction. I think most people looking at America now kind of think that too.”
     The rock legend then went on to draw a line between the issues portrayed in “American Pie” and the current climate in the U.S.A.

     For me, the song is… well… conflicted. Yes, it’s literate and clever. That was one of Don McLean’s gifts; he was an exceptionally intelligent, knowledgeable, and eloquent songwriter. But like most hits of that era, it was soon everywhere. College dormitories resounded with it, and not necessarily from college kids’ stereos.

     “American Pie” quickly became the most-loved song at my dorm…and the most-hated by me. I lost count of the number of times I was coerced into playing and singing it. Dorm mates would seek me out and plead for me to join their little parties. (There was always a party going on somewhere in the dorm, and while there were plenty of decent guitarists in the building, I was the only one who could remember the whole lyric.) And then the chants would begin: “Just one more time, Fran!” It could make me wish I’d never learned to play.

     Today, oh so many years down the time stream, I… like the song – it stirs some pleasant memories of nimble fingers, a singing voice long since devolved to inarticulate growls, and rapt-eyed college girls who’d bed down with better-looking boys – but I greatly prefer other Don McLean tunes. Then again, I no longer sing and play for random gatherings of drunk and stoned college kids.

     I can’t close this piece with anything but my favorite Don McLean tune. From his Tapestry album:

Minnesota Nice

     [A short story for you. The corruption of the 2020 presidential balloting has had me thinking about what the Right might do to counter further attempts in that direction. Perhaps the idea encapsulated in this story would suffice, though I’m sure there would be the most vigorous of protests from the Left. – FWP

     UPDATE August 23, 2024: It feels like a good time to repost this. — FWP]

***

     “What time you got?” the driver muttered.
     Simon glanced at his cellphone. “One ten. Plenty of time left. Anyway, they’ve already got all the windows boarded up and posted guards at the entrances, so we’ll be okay even if we arrive a little after three.”
     “Good,” the driver said. “Then I’m not gonna push this rig any harder.” He grinned. “She’s got a few years on her. Like me.”
     Simon grunted but made no other reply.
     Be a lot easier to relax about this if we didn’t need to have this crap trucked in from out of state. But there’d be too many ways to trace a load printed in Minnesota.
     The enormous surge of support for the Trump / Gaetz ticket had almost caught the Democrats unaware. There would be little chance of saving Minnesota’s electoral college votes for the Harris / Cortez ticket without deploying every known stratagem. Simon was just thankful that those methods had proved effective four years previously.
     Fortunes of war, I guess. You do what you have to do to win, and make adjustments later.
     He sat back, let his eyes rest on the passing woods, and tried to relax.
     Less than two miles from the Minnesota state line, a seeming explosion erupted from the front of the truck’s cab. The vehicle listed and slewed wildly to the left. The driver wrestled with the steering wheel as the truck slid several hundred feet forward before he could safely bring it to a stop. They debarked, hustled around to the front of the cab, and found that both the truck’s front left tires had been blown out.
     “God damn!” the driver snarled.
     “Can you fix it?” Simon said.
     The driver shook his head. “I only got the one spare. Can’t run the cab on just one. Not enough traction. So what now?”
     “Hang on.” Simon pulled out his cellphone. He looked up the number for Minnesota Democratic headquarters and started to dial.
     “Drop it! Hands in the air!”
     Simon’s head jerked around toward the unfamiliar voice. He saw six men in camo and balaclavas, each toting a rifle, approaching from the right. Six more, similarly garbed and equipped, were converging on the truck from the left. He raised his hands.
     The first of the intruders swung the butt of his rifle at the cellphone in Simon’s right hand. It flew thirty feet and landed on the macadam with a distinct sound of shattering plastic and glass. Simon gasped and cradled his bruised hand.
     “That was a fifteen hundred dollar iPhone 14,” he ground out.
     “So sorry,” his assailant said. “I did tell you to drop it.”
     “What the hell is this?” the driver shouted.
     “We just want to perform a quick inventory of your load, my friend,” Simon’s assailant said. “We have to satisfy ourselves that you’re not carrying contraband.”
     “You won’t find anything valuable,” Simon said.
     “Value is relative,” Simon’s assailant said. He gestured his companions forward and around to the back of the truck. It seemed he was the leader of the force that had waylaid them. “It depends on context. And today’s context is the kind that discards diamonds and sneers at gold, but puts great value on slips of paper.” He waved at the driver with the muzzle of his rifle. “Open up.”
     Muttering, Simon and the driver trudged around to the back of the truck. The driver looked meaningfully at Simon, who nodded. The driver unlocked the tailgate and stepped back.
     The leader nodded at the hundreds of cardboard boxes. “As we suspected. Pull ‘em out, boys.” The others converged on the load, toted boxes out, stacked them in the street a decent distance from the truck, and ripped them open. The leader crouched and riffled through the contents of several boxes, grunting as he went. Finally he rose with a fistful of papers: the ballots Simon had had printed in New York. Each bore a vote for the Harris / Cortez presidential ticket.
     The leader turned to Simon. “We’ll be confiscating these.”
     “But—” Simon immediately forced himself back to silence. The leader nodded.
     “It’s not going to be like last time, my friend. The votes of Minnesotans will be tallied up without any…help from your sort. This will be as honest an election as we can make it.”
     Simon sneered. “Are you a Minnesotan?”
     The leader pulled off his balaclava and smiled. “As it happens, I am,” he said. “As are most of the others here. But it wouldn’t have mattered if I weren’t. What you were about to do constitutes a federal felony. Interstate election fraud, and in a presidential election at that. I don’t know how many years you would get for it, but I think they figure them per ballot.” He waved at the boxes. “You’ve got thousands of ballots here. You wouldn’t be getting out of prison except in a pine box.”
     The leader quickly surveyed the inside of the truck to ensure that his team had missed nothing, turned to another of his companions, and beckoned him forward. As the man approached the load, it became apparent that he was toting a flamethrower and wore a cylinder of compressed gas as a backpack. At a nod from the leader, he lit the device, adjusted its throw, and played bright blue flames over the boxes of ballots.. When the leader was satisfied that all the boxes had been reduced to uselessness, he turned to the driver and smiled.
     “If you don’t have a cellphone,” he said, “I’d be happy to call a truck repair service to deal with those tires for you.”
     “I’ve got one,” the driver muttered.
     “Then I suppose our business is concluded.” The leader gestured his team back into the woods that flanked the highway.
     “This won’t change anything,” Simon said. “You think stopping us will sweep back the tide? There are a whole lot of others out tonight working to make sure President Harris gets a second term.”
     “Oh, we know it well,” the leader said. “We have a whole lot of teams out tonight too. Some of them are monitoring the roads into Minnesota, like my team. Some of them have cordoned off the ballot counting centers, to make sure that anyone who gets past us with a load of fraudulent ballots won’t get in. And some of them are in those centers, armed just as we are, standing watch over the ballot counters to make sure there’s no hanky-panky with the legitimately cast votes. You see,” he said, “you threw away the rules. You decided that the only thing that matters is winning—retaining power. But if there are no rules for you, there are no rules for us, either. The difference between you and us is that we trust the voters to make the right choice.”
     He glanced over his shoulder at his team as it vanished into the forest, faced Simon, and nodded once more.
     “You have a nice day, now. Minnesota nice!

==<O>==

     Copyright © 2021 by Francis W. Porretto. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.

Some Pictures Showing the JOY of the Democrats

Yet another non -joyful Walz (doesn’t he look a lot like Ed Asner?)

I could not find an angry looking Hillary Clinton photo. Since it’s very rare for her to look happy, not irritated, or with a fixed smile that tries to hide a seething interior, I’m gonna guess that she is either on some HEAVY mood-stabilizing meds, or has been hypnotized. Or both.

It was also hard to find non smiling photos of Michelle. A few snide or smirking ones. But there was this.

My best guess is that they have all been ordered to “Smile, Comrade”.

Conversations

     Breathes there a man who isn’t instantly and near-terminally irritated by cold-call salesmen? If anything it’s worse when the caller is selling something you don’t need, never have needed, and never will need barring an act of Congress or God. The impulse to shriek something obscene and slam the phone down can be close to irresistible… though be it said at once, I’ve learned to resist it, having ruined far too many phones already.

     Still, a cold caller can be an occasion for whimsy, as James Veitch has told us. And just a little while ago, one such occurred, and my whimsy switch flipped just like that:

FWP: Hello?
Cold Caller: (in a thick south-Indian accent) Hello, is this Francis?
FWP: Who is this, please?
CC: (insistently) Is this Francis Porretto?
FWP: No, you identify yourself first.
CC: Ah, I’m Roger, and I represent XXX Development, a specialist in mobile app development. Does your business have any need for one?

     I was tempted to do the shriek-and-slam, but it occurred to me that there was another, far more amusing way to cope with this gentleman’s intrusion:

FWP: Actually, I have been thinking about contracting for one. How much experience does your company have? Have you dealt with any really large clients? Say, Fortune 1000 or larger?

     There was a remarkable interval of silence. I think “Roger” might have been overwhelmed by the possibility that he’d caught a “whale.” But he recovered:

CC: Oh yes, we’ve developed apps for many large firms. We guarantee you—
FWP: Never mind that. I need an app that will function globally, as I do business worldwide. Can you produce an app that can cross the carrier differences among the continents?

     Have you ever sensed a surge of pure greed over the telephone? It’s quite an experience.

CC: I think we can help you, Mr.—
FWP: Dr. Porretto, please!
CC: Yes, of course. First, what’s the nature of your business?
FWP: (after a slow count to three) I’m an arms dealer.

     In all candor, Gentle Reader, I expected “Roger” to hang up at that point. But he didn’t:

CC: I see. You sell globally, you said?

     And now for the windup, and the pitch:

FWP: Yes, I broker small arms, armored transports, short-range ballistic missiles and surface-to-air missiles.
CC: … I see. And where are your sales currently concentrated?
FWP: Just now, mostly in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Bangla Desh. I do sell some odd-lots in Sri Lanka, but my volume there is minor by comparison… Hello? Hello?

     I set the phone down gently and smiled. Chalk one up for the home team.

The Credibility Is No Longer There

     Via AoSHQ, we have this from the Washington Post:

     In retrospect, Mr. Biden should not have sought reelection. The June 27 debate was worse than just a bad night, as the president maintained afterward. The 81-year-old had shown signs of slipping for a long time, but his inner circle worked to conceal his decline. He and the country would have been better off if Mr. Biden had kept his implied promise from the 2020 campaign to be a “transitional” figure, perhaps by bowing out after the Democrats’ surprisingly good showing in the 2022 midterm elections.
     But second-guessing is easy, and Mr. Biden’s decision gives time and space to underscore his accomplishments: historic climate and infrastructure legislation; support for Ukraine in resistance to Russian aggression; expanded health insurance coverage. [Emphasis added]

     Never mind that the Establishment knew that Biden was senile practically from the beginning of the 2020 presidential campaign. Never mind that they deliberately propped up that senile old man as the president of the United States, to shield its inner machinations from public view. Never mind that the election was verifiably stolen to put that dementia patient into the power seat. And never mind that the Usurper Regime’s “historic” legislation, involvement in an insane foreign war, and deliberate opening of the U.S. border have resulted in an economy in which two jobs are often not enough and no one feels secure. Let’s all move on from that so we can celebrate how selflessly the senile old man surrendered power under threat of removal by 25th Amendment procedure:

     It is Mr. Biden’s willingness to surrender power, albeit via internal party machinations rather than the ballot box, that deserves recognition. It creates a powerful and, for Mr. Biden, favorable contrast with Mr. Trump — who refused to acknowledge defeat in 2020 and instead stirred up a mob in Washington on Jan. 6, 2021. The last weeks have shown how Mr. Biden’s withdrawal created a pathway for a new generation of Democratic leaders.

     Because that’s what matters, isn’t it?

     God give me strength. This acerbic Web commentator gig is getting to me.

***

     Media credibility is the basis upon which politicians attempt to ingratiate themselves with the media. However, the process, even when successful, produces benefits that are somewhat less than they might seem. Still, everyone loves positive notices in the press. Yea verily, even in the very small and local press; I’m here to tell you. But when the praise becomes too consistent, or too fervent, or too dismissive of countervailing, verifiable facts, reader reaction can be other than what the politician at issue would like.

     The Washington Post is not alone in its dalliance with the Democrat Party. The Democrats have invested a huge amount – money, effort, and the time of its luminaries – in courting the media, especially the major national newspapers and television networks. I’m reasonably certain that the efforts to keep those media allies in the Democrat camp are ongoing and substantial. But the hour is upon us for reflection on what return there has been on all that investment. Does it still “pay off?”

     The major media are under considerable pressure. The decline in readership and viewership being suffered by those media is impossible to conceal. Circulation – “eyeballs,” as it’s come to be known – determines revenue from advertisers and sponsors. An increasing number of news consumers disdain the majors in favor of alternative outlets. Their attempts to position themselves on the Web as entertaining and lively round-the-clock sources of news, opinion, and gossip have not slowed the deterioration of their status.

     They’re putting a lot of effort into shoring up their levees, Gentle Reader. It’s simply not working. Recent trends in “cord-cutting” provide ample confirmation.

     A great part of the media’s problem lies in exactly what I mentioned above. A rising number of Americans believe them to be partisan rather than objective. Owing to their consistency, their fervor, and their dismissal of contrary facts, their alliance with the Democrat Party has become too obvious. Theirs is the praise of boughten allies. PR agents, if you will.

     But to back away from those practices is not easy for major-media editors and publishers. At best it’s like admitting to a giant error, something journalists are as reluctant to do as politicians. At worst it tears the rest of the veil from their subservience to the barons of the Democrat Party, revealing the American news industry’s lack of an ethical core.

     Thomas Jefferson famously said that if he had to choose between government without newspapers or newspapers without government, he would unhesitatingly choose the latter. But as brilliant as he was – and he was, Gentle Reader; the foremost mind among the Founding Fathers –he did not foresee the rise of a dominant cartel of nationally organized and distributed media organs whose allegiance could be purchased by a major political party. He never got to see what my friend Lynn saw as they swelled: their decline toward illegitimacy.

That Lucky Old Sun

Way back when I had long hair and things didn’t hurt, I was actually a pretty good musician. I played drums and saxophone, and I sang. That fell by the wayside as my military career started taking bigger and bigger chunks out of my life. There were other considerations as well, some valid and some not, that prevented me from enjoying music the way that I used to do.

Well, now I’m retired and dammit, I wanted to find some musical outlet. The ukulele groups seemed like a bunch of old cat ladies, and a lot of the things that would get me back into drums seemed to have a large portion of the population that indulges in recreational pharmaceuticals, and I don’t like being around drunk people all that much, nevermind someone who’s on the harder stuff.

And then I found a singing group. I figured I’d give it a shot. Turns out it was the local chapter of the Society for the Preservation and Encouragement of Barbershop Quartet Singing in America, or the SPEBSQSA.

Yes, that name is tongue in cheek. They’re the Barbershop Harmony Society. When they were formed, a lot of organizations had long high-faluting names that seemed as if they got paid for every letter in the acronym. And so the Barbershop group said “Let’s see how many letters we can make up about singing!”

Well, I did sing barbershop in high school lo these many decades ago, let’s see if I can still do it.

Turns out, I can. And decent enough that I had people coming up asking me to join their quartet. I’m in two of them, one that’s for caroling and one that’s just a group having fun. On the latter, this is the next song we’ll be singing.

Up in the morning, out on the job
Work like the devil for my pay
But that lucky old sun got nothin’ to do
But roll around heaven all day

Fuss with my woman, toil for my kids
Sweat till I’m wrinkled and gray
While that lucky old sun has nothin’ to do
But roll around heaven all day

Good Lord above, can’t you know I’m pining
Tears all in my eyes
Send down that cloud with a silver lining
Lift me to Paradise

Show me that river, take me across
And wash all my troubles away
Like that lucky old sun, give me nothin’ to do
But roll around heaven all day

It’s gonna be a while before I get to be like that lucky old Sun. On my bad days, I really really feel this song. Anyways, I’m off to try to slap myself out of this foul mood. Perhaps a beer and a cigar will help.

The End Of The Totalitarian Road

     Power is a drug that doesn’t sate. – Me.

     It’s frustrating, having to make the same point over and over. Still, needs must.

     When Clarence Carson wrote:

     [W]e are told that there is no need to fear the concentration of power in government so long as that power is checked by the electoral process. We are urged to believe that so long as we can express our disagreement in words, we have our full rights to disagree. Now both freedom of speech and the electoral process are important to liberty, but alone they are only the desiccated remains of liberty. [Emphasis added]

     …he was saying more than most of his readers grasped. Remains, as in human remains, are… drum roll, please… what’s left of something when the rest of it is gone. The soul has departed; the mind no longer functions; the corpse is all that remains. Dr. Carson’s phrasing perfectly captures the relationship of freedom of expression plus the vote to true liberty. When he wrote those words, they were all that remains of the liberty the progenitors of this nation bequeathed us.

     Today, both are under sustained and severe attack.

     When I wrote:

     As long as freedom of speech and of the press were respected, there was a chance that the country might rally, might right itself and demand the rolling-back of government’s usurped powers in a voice too loud to be ignored. If matters as of Tuesday [i.e., December 9, 2003, when President G. W. Bush signed the McCain-Feingold Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform Act] are permitted to remain as they are, that chance is gone.

     …I was concerned with the denial of Americans’ right of free expression by the American federal government. The McCain-Feingold Act was eventually struck down, though Washington continues to probe for ways to silence those who oppose it. However, today, outsourcing that activity is the prevailing practice. Moreover, our would-be censors are reaching out to the governments of other nations:

     The globalist tyrants in control of the European Union sent a letter to Elon Musk on Monday demanding the X owner censor President Donald Trump during their interview tonight.
     The letter was sent by Thierry Breton and was dated August 12, 2024.
     Thierry Breton is a French business executive, politician, writer and the current Commissioner for Internal Market of the European Union.
     In the letter, Thierry warns Elon Musk, “You have the legal obligation to ensure X’s compliance with EU law and in particular the DSA in the EU.”

     Laughably, Thierry-Breton claimed that censoring Musk’s interview of a former president is compatible with ensuring “freedom of expression and of information, including media freedom and pluralism.” His beef is with “harmful content.” Harmful how? Harmful to whom? Silence.

     Don’t imagine for a moment that the mandarins in D.C. aren’t fully in accord with this. They may even have stimulated it.

     It enrages the political Establishments of the West that Elon Musk has cleansed Twitter / X of the censorship and suppression policies that prevailed before his acquisition. A free medium of personal expression is the deadliest of all dangers to them. They must bring it to heel, or destroy it.

     Now that electoral processes have been so thoroughly corrupted, freedom of expression is all we have left. It’s always been a threat to Establishmentarians here and elsewhere, but their successful use of gradualism has eroded away all the rest of the liberty we once enjoyed. That frees the tyrants to attack freedom of speech, and they’re wasting no time in going after it.

     Elon Musk, a notably independent-minded man, will probably defy the EU. That doesn’t mean the threat can be dismissed. He’s under attack from several directions. Any one of them has the potential to bring him down. At any rate, it’s unwise to repose one’s hopes for freedom in a lone individual, however worthy or wealthy.

     Use your voices while you still have them. It may all too soon be time to use your guns…a right those of other lands surrendered long ago.

Viciouser And Viciouser

     This has been a hot topic these last two days:

     That’s the Left for you. Acquiring and retaining power is so important to them that no tool, however misshapen, is considered out of bounds. Outright lies? Check. Defamation and slander? Check. Knowingly false accusations of felony crimes? Check. Wishing terrible, inexcusable harm upon an opponent or a member of his family? Oh my oh yes, check.

     Vance was as shocked and incredulous as you might have expected:

     …because good people, the sort who sincerely try to “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you,” cannot imagine the mindset required to emit such a scurrility. But that’s the Right for you… mostly, anyway.

     Of course, the subject is abortion. Notice that Leftists tend to talk around this topic. They use phrases like “reproductive health care,” “a woman’s right to choose,” and “safe medical procedures.” Never “the right to kill that inconvenient byproduct of my carelessness,” which is exactly what their circumlocutions actually mean. And note how they harp upon cases of rape and incest, as if so terrible a wrong could be made right by killing an innocent third party.

     Pascal and I have written a great deal about the death cults operating among us. Few persons have taken us seriously. Perhaps the hour has come to do so, Gentle Readers. Mankind is under extreme threat – and not from “global warming” or any such phantasm. The threat emanates from within Mankind’s own body, the last place a decent person would expect to find a will-to-exterminate-oneself.

     In one of those striking coincidences that compel me to wonder whether I’m receiving guidance from the supernatural realm, just yesterday evening the C.S.O. and I watched this drama. It’s about a medical doctor obsessed with death, owing to a near-death experience she had as a teenager. She strives to murder anyone she can find who has ever been “brought back” – i.e., resuscitated – after a near-fatal incident. In truth, she wants to die herself, because she believes that it would take her to a far better place than “this dump of a world.” But she can’t quite bring herself to do it.

     Think about those around you who support unlimited abortion rights. Think about them in toto: the entire constellation of their convictions and opinions. And remember this horrifying episode and this one while you’re at it. The connections are there. One merely has to allow oneself to see them.

Miscellaneous Jottings

     I haven’t done one of these lately, and the “FUT COL” folder is beginning to bulge. Therefore…

***

1. Today’s Telescreen.

     Stephen Green comments:

     The deal was a simple one: free TV included ads, and pay TV didn’t. Not only are streaming services altering the deal, but your TV manufacturer is also turning your TV into a two-way telescreen straight out of George Orwell’s “1984.”
     Big Brother is watching you watch TV for real.
     Frustrated consumers have watched almost helplessly as their smart TVs and streaming boxes — hardware we paid for! — have become digital ad platforms.

     I dislike the word inevitable, but what Steve tells us about above comes close to being exactly that. The streaming services are in competition with one another, and their basic tool is content. But among content creators, some stand out while others can barely stand up. To purchase the creations of the stand-outs takes money – an increasing amount of money as more and more players attempt to get into the streaming game.

     It will shake out in time. Here at the Fortress, we’ve been enjoying a lot of shows on Freevee, which is available through Amazon Prime. Yes, there are commercials. So what?

     Apropos of Steve’s larger point, the easiest way to minimize your TV’s monitoring of what goes on in your living room is to plug it into a power bar with a switch on it, and to turn it off from the power bar when you’re not watching anything. It works for us, anyway. Of course, we could stop watching televised entertainment altogether, but… nah. Even a Certified Galactic Intellect needs some downtime.

***

2. Doings Across the Pond.

     Britain’s in bad shape, but few Americans know just how bad:

     Over at Vlad’s place, Eeyore expands thus:

     In France, a bakery stopped serving pork because muslims threatened to burn down the shop if they didn’t stop serving pork. Clearly the bakery felt they had no recourse in law, so they stopped serving pork. In France. A country built on pork second only to China. And maybe Germany. A better example of defacto vs. dejure would be hard to find. But also an example of the phrase Coughlin repeats in most briefings:

     “It’s time to stop seeing what you know, and start knowing what you see”. And what you see is sharia law, and communism. Not “two tiered justice” or hypocrisy. It is in fact a non-corrupt form of a different system. If your cat is replaced by a dog, it is not a corrupted cat. It is a dog, Keep treating it like a cat and it will not go well for you.

     I could not have put it better. America isn’t all that far from happenings of this sort. It is indeed time to “know what you see.”

***

3. Now For A Few Words From Our Founder:

     By way of Moonbattery, we have this:

     Catholic Charities of the Diocese of Superior asked the Supreme Court [Friday] to overturn a decision of the Wisconsin Supreme Court and recognize that its care for the poor, the elderly, and the disabled is part of its religious mission. In Catholic Charities Bureau v. Wisconsin Labor & Industry Review Commission, the Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled 4-3 earlier this year that Catholic Charities’ service to the poor and needy did not count as “typical” religious activities. This means that Catholic Charities is prevented from leaving the state’s unemployment compensation program and joining the Wisconsin Catholic Church’s better program. …

     Under Wisconsin law, non-profits that are operated for a religious purpose are generally exempt from the state’s unemployment compensation program. The Wisconsin Supreme Court, however, ruled that Catholic Charities was not exempt because it serves everyone, not just Catholics.

     But the Founder of Christianity – you may have heard of Him – said this to His disciples:

     When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory: And before him shall be gathered all nations: and he shall separate them one from another, as a shepherd divideth his sheep from the goats: And he shall set the sheep on his right hand, but the goats on the left.
     Then shall the King say unto them on his right hand, Come, ye blessed of my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me in: Naked, and ye clothed me: I was sick, and ye visited me: I was in prison, and ye came unto me.
     Then shall the righteous answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, and fed thee? or thirsty, and gave thee drink? When saw we thee a stranger, and took thee in? or naked, and clothed thee? Or when saw we thee sick, or in prison, and came unto thee?
     And the King shall answer and say unto them, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye have done it unto one of the least of these my brethren, ye have done it unto me.
     Then shall he say also unto them on the left hand, Depart from me, ye cursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels: For I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat: I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink: I was a stranger, and ye took me not in: naked, and ye clothed me not: sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not.
     Then shall they also answer him, saying, Lord, when saw we thee an hungred, or athirst, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not minister unto thee?
     Then shall he answer them, saying, Verily I say unto you, Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not to me.
     And these shall go away into everlasting punishment: but the righteous into life eternal.

     Yet Leftists say there’s no “war on Christianity” in progress.

***

4. Back To The TV For A Moment.

     A few years ago, the C.S.O. and I decided to unsubscribe from our regional television cablecaster. We had our reasons:

  • Disproportionate representation of homosexuals in dramas;
  • Preponderance of Negroes as brilliant scientists and technical specialists;
  • Many shows promoted interracial romances, especially a Negro man with a Caucasian woman.

     Since then we’ve surveyed alternate sources of entertainment for our evening hours. Most have disappointed us. Even the ones we’ve remained with have problems similar to the reasons we “cut the cord.” It’s been an education, to say the least.

     However, a few nights ago we stumbled upon an older series on Freevee that we hadn’t previously experienced: The Librarians. We’ve only seen three episodes of it so far, but so far, there are:

  • No homosexuals or other perversions on display;
  • No Negroes in positions that require exceptional brilliance or technical savvy;
  • No interracial romances!

     Looks promising. I wonder how it got past the “diversity officers” and “sensitivity monitors?” To companies contemplating entering the streaming game: You might find that there are a fair number of families who prefer entertainment that doesn’t slather the viewer with Leftist bullshit about race and sex. Give it some thought.

***

5. Finally, A Revelation From The CDC.

     From Fox News:

     The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported that the birth rate in America has dropped to a historic low, decreasing by 3% since 2022.
     The rate has been on a steady decline since 2014, except for a brief 1% increase from 2020 to 2021.
     In recent years, the priorities of young Americans have been changing, including the desire to have children, the data suggests.

     No, really? What an incredible surprise. 🥱 Given all the disincentives a modern couple has to surmount before deciding to procreate, any other outcome would have been a jolt, a portent of massive changes to come. But the CDC has to say something informative now and then, to retain the shreds of its former reputation as a genuinely useful government agency.

     In other news, you can get a free vasectomy or abortion at the Democrats’ National Convention in Chicago this week. Such a convenience!

***

     That’s all for today, Gentle Reader. Be well, stay safe, and try not to drive through the puddles. They may be deeper than you think.

When They Eat Their Own

     It can be glorious to watch:

     Vice President Kamala Harris, hoping to distance herself from President Biden’s unpopularity on the economy, plans a new focus on middle-class worries and woes.
     Why it matters: Beginning in North Carolina later this week with her first policy speech, and continuing next week with the Democratic convention in Chicago, Harris will tell Americans — most for the first time — who she is and how she’d govern.
     Harris won’t say it this bluntly in public, but her advisers do so privately: She wants to break with Biden on issues on which he’s unpopular. First up: rising prices. This is part of a highly choreographed effort to define herself — in some cases, redefine herself — as a different kind of Democrat.

     The policies of the Biden Regime have been so bad for the country that to have any chance at all of being elected – even with massive vote fraud – Harris must pretend that she had nothing at all to do with them. But the Regime is not cooperating:

     Quoth RedState’s Stacey Matthews:

     Here’s the thing: Democrats and the media want Harris to have it both ways. On one hand, they say she was present for Biden’s most consequential decisions as a trusted advisor and yet when she feels the heat of those decisions they then turn around and suggest she wasn’t a part of that process at all.
     Either way, though, it’s a bad look for Harris, as not being there for Biden’s major decisions sort of proves claims from her many critics about her being an empty suit, while being there puts her on the hook for every single one of them.

     Do politicians spend a lot of their youths playing Twister? The game seems good practice for their later exercises in contortion.

Commie-la’s price controls

After I enlisted and left the area, Dad finally told his old job, with it’s toxic boss who slept her way to the top, to take a flying fuck at a rolling donut and went out to find a new job. Dad was a computer and math whiz. He put his resume out there, and was immediately snapped up by a business right across the border in Washington that supplied grocery stores. It was essentially a massive warehouse. A logistics hub. Dad said that it looked like the hanger for the Millennium Falcon. They supplied grocery stores all over Eastern Washington and Northern Idaho.

Dad, along with several other people, worked to reduce waste and make every dollar that came in count. During year two of his time there, the company threw a party because they had managed to hit the highest profit margin that they had seen in decades.

That profit margin? 1%.

If Commie-la sets her price controls, that company goes out of business. And every single grocery store that they supply can’t get groceries or other sundry goods.

This isn’t some unknown economic theory. People know this. We’ve seen the results in countries like the USSR.

If you wonder why the US Education system seems like it’s deliberately dumbing down its students, that’s because IT IS DOING THAT ON PURPOSE. Because of voters actually knew what price controls would do, they wouldn’t be supporting Commie-la Harris.

Buy more ammo.

Leave it to Slow Joe…

…to pick the DUMBEST INDIAN on the planet.

I mean, think of it.

People from the Indian subcontinent are generally thought of as leaning towards the intelligent side of the Bell Curve. Not every one is a genius (although many are, including some that are math stars), but the average Indian possesses sufficient brain power to climb to the top of the academic pyramid, generate a substantial part of the GNP, and start more businesses than the average Native-born American.

But not Kamala (Commie-La).

She has been around smart, or at least academic people most of her life. When she tries to produce an intelligent statement, all too often, we hear it and say, “WTF?”

Her best ideas are recycled from others – including her opponent Trump – and when she hits a place where her wordy mish-mash just stops, she fills the gap with a hefty dose of meaningless laughter.

Even when the subject is serious – such as the situation in Afghanistan – she simply cannot keep from laughing.

She is an airhead, whose greatest accomplishment is proving that Blondes are NOT the dumbest people on the planet.

This looks interesting – the DNC Convention could be an even more violent repeat of 1968. I do feel sorry for the citizens and the cops and fire fighters who have to do combat duty over this week.

For those who are beginning to wonder, “Is it time to leave?” – remember this motto:

Earlier is Better Than Later

You Can Always Return, if it IS Too Early

You are SERIOUSLY Screwed if You are Too Late

This video at the link was FOUR years ago. She hasn’t gotten less radical.

Diseases Part 2: The Corporate Oligopoly

     There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root. – Henry David Thoreau

     The previous piece called for an examination of what have unfortunately become called “root causes.” Our social, economic, and political maladies didn’t spring from the brow of Zeus; they grew slowly in response to perverse incentives. Those incentives arose from the decisions and actions of (mostly) well-intentioned persons who held political power. Because the consequences emerged over an extended period, those (mostly) well-intentioned persons never had to confront their errors.

     Among our current crop of afflictions, the easiest case to analyze is the dominance of our economy – and to an ominous degree, of our politics as well – by a relatively small group of businesses. There are roughly four million businesses in operation in these United States today. Yet the economy is largely steered by the largest three thousand of them. Moreover, the concentration of economic influence has not ceased; the largest among those three thousand continue to grow, often at the expense of their smaller brethren.

     This is not a healthy situation. Among other things, it’s given rise to the economic-political phenomenon of the “too big to fail” corporation, and the consequent willingness of legislatures to “bail out” such companies when events go against them. Surely we shouldn’t prefer this situation to one where a malfunctioning business can be allowed to fail without affecting the lives of millions (and the tax dollars of millions of others). But how did it come about?

     As usual, there’s more than one cause, but what appears to me to be the key to the matter is corporate privilege.

     The corporation is a legal construct that has some of the properties of a living person but lacks the full set of responsibilities of one. When a business incorporates, it diffuses responsibilities over the whole company that would otherwise attach to specific individuals in it. It also shields those individuals from personal liability for things they do in the name of the corporation. Also, corporations receive much different tax treatment than do individuals.

     The tax matter is often in the public conversation, so let’s address that first. Different tax rates apply to businesses and individuals, but more to the point, corporations can deduct from its revenues far more things than a workingman. For example, a business can deduct the cost of maintenance on its headquarters as a cost of doing business; a workingman can’t deduct home-maintenance expenses from his income. Employees’ salaries, wages, and benefits are fully deductible; the workingman doesn’t have any comparable privilege. A sharp corporate tax accountant can make a substantial profit on annual operations look like a loss for tax purposes.

     While it’s not obvious, the corporate form also provides an incentive to break the law, if it can be done profitably. This goes well beyond deceitful accounting. It reaches such operations as industrial espionage, vandalism and sabotage, the bribery of public officials, and smear tactics that target important competitors. Even when such crimes are revealed, a corporation that benefits from skullduggery is usually capable of protecting the particular individuals who committed the illegalities from personal exposure. Oftentimes a boughten legislator or jurist will assist in that effort.

     So the corporate form provides advantages to the dishonest and unprincipled over the unincorporated business, the incorporated-but-honestly-operated business, and the individual. Moreover, a larger corporation will enjoy corporate privileges more extensively than a smaller one, because the larger, more complex corporation will have more niches in which to hide its naughtinesses. As I wrote in this piece:


Complexity privileges layabouts and villains.
Therefore, layabouts and villains will seek complexity.
If they can’t find it, they’ll attempt to create it.

     Therefore once a corporation has a size advantage over its competitors, its exploitation of the range of corporate privileges can and will ramify and accelerate. Add to this that governments prefer to deal with larger companies rather than with smaller ones. Add further that governments can “outsource” various policies and operations that are Constitutionally forbidden to governments themselves, and the dynamic virtually leaps off the page.

     Once all this is factored into the situation, the question changes from “How did this happen to the American economy?” to “Why did it take so long?”

     For a few more thoughts on this aspect of America’s current economic maladies, see this old essay, which I wrote in 1997 after becoming disillusioned with contemporary economic thought.

I’ve Had a VERY Long Weekend!

It started on Friday afternoon with an odd phenomenon:

  • Flashing lights in the perimeter of my vision. Not constant, but intermittent. At first, I thought it might be reflections off the lenses of my trifocal lenses. I took them off, but the problem persisted.
  • After an hour or so, they were not going away. I checked, and my ophthalmologist’s office was closed.
  • I was now more aware of my vision, and noticed an increase in “floaters”. Now, some of those, I’d had since childhood – they were almost transparent, and were only visible on an unpatterned, light surface – like a cloudless sky.
  • These new floaters were smaller, light brown, and resembled a small smear. There was also a larger one that resembled dark gray lace, near the outside of my left eye.
  • I put in some eyedrops, put my Kindle away, and went to be early. I planned to call my doctor first thing Monday.
  • In the morning, I still had the same optical anomalties. I did a web search using the terms “dark floaters”, “lightning flashes” and “eyes”, and, after a lot of ads and unqualified people with a website, found some accredited experts (I believe Mayo Clinic was one) who agreed on the essential info – If this happens, it is considered an Optical Emergency. Seek medical attention immediately.

Well, that scared the Living Jesus out of me.

I was pretty sure that driving would not be a good idea, so I called my children who live not that far from me. One was busy at the time, but the other agreed to drive me, if I could wait about an hour.

At the ER, they didn’t hesitate to get me seen. I had a lot of questions about getting hit in the head, falling down, and asked over and over again, in different ways, “Do you feel safe at home?”

To be honest, I thought this was just more mandated-from-above CYA nonsense, but later learned that falls and head blows were among the most common reasons these symptoms popped up. As this had not been the case, I answered in the negative.

After that quick triage, the intake nurse left the room, and I heard her say, “I have a triage that needs to be seen right now.”

That ‘triage’ was me. For the first time, I started getting seriously concerned.

I got the usual vital signs check, then waited for a doctor to see me – not long at all.

He shined lights in my eye – a LOT. and had me do a vision check with my glasses, one eye at a time.

He left for a while, then came back and said he thought I was OK, but was waiting for a final call.

When he came back again, he said I needed to go to the UH main campus, and see another ophthalmologist. My son agreed to take me there. When we arrived, I told him I was likely to be a while, and that he could leave. I would call someone when I was finished. As he was hungry, and the Browns game was soon to start, he agreed.

Again, I didn’t have to wait all that long. This time, the tests were longer, and far more extensive. I learned in the course of chatting with my doctor that University Hospitals has a dedicated Center for Retinal and Macular Diseases Surgery. So, luckily, I was in the right spot to be helped.

Around 4:30, I was finally released. The diagnosis was the best possible. Apparently, optical fluid shrinks as we age. It can cause symptoms such as I had. But, so can retinal tears, caused by the same shrinkage. I was released with permission to fly and drive (good thing, as I had planned to do BOTH very soon.

I came home, thanked God, and went to be early, relieved that I wasn’t going to lose my sight.

The Bear

     [A short story for you today. New residents in an old, well-established neighborhood must observe the customs of the place. If they want to be accepted, that is. — FWP]


     Andrew stepped out of the dense thicket of trees and into a clearing of sorts. About ten yards ahead stood a row of willows, regularly spaced. The intervening space was clear of any other woody vegetation. He approached cautiously and found that the willows lined the bank of a small river.
     He strode to the bank and gazed down at the stream.
     The river was about ten yards wide. It flowed westward through a respectably deep gorge. In the dry September weather, its flow was serenely quiet. Its opposite bank was lined by a similar row of willows. The trees stretched eastward and westward to the limits of his vision.
     The uncanny orderliness of the scene, amid such untamed woodland, made him smile.
     Nice.
     He sat by the bank, pulled his notebook and pen out of his backpack, and made notes.
     Andrew had inherited the land a few weeks earlier. It was only the third time he’d set out to explore it. It would take a while before he could feel that he knew it well, for there was a lot of it: more than a square mile of wooded New York wilderness. He’d resolved to cover it all, to familiarize himself with all of it, and to make a record of its salient features. The river certainly qualified as such.
     It’s as pristine and gorgeous as the rest of this place. No wonder they fought so hard to keep it out of the state’s clutches.
     He still lacked an explanation for why his parents had purchased the land in the first place. They’d bought it when he was a teen. Three years before their deaths, they’d paid to have a patch cleared and a large rustic cabin built on it. It had to have been a considerable expense. Yet he could not remember either of them ever announcing that they were headed to the cabin for a weekend, or even a day. Certainly they’d never brought him there.
     Neither his brother Devin nor his sister Rachel had ever said anything about it. Though the will had made it their joint property, Andrew’s siblings had swiftly deeded it to him. The use and management of it were on his shoulders. It had made him wonder what they knew that he didn’t. Yet they’d said nothing more to him, whatever they might have said to one another.
     His acquaintance with the land and the cabin had brought about changes he could not yet explain.
     His decision to retire from wage labor at only thirty-eight came as a surprise to his supervisors, but even more so to him. The decision to terminate his lease and make the cabin his home had seemed to follow from it. Yet both decisions had come altogether naturally, as if they had been made by God and were only being announced to him on the spot.
     I won’t starve without a salary. What I’ll do to fill my days, apart from writing a bit more, I still don’t know. Read, think. Wander around out here, I suppose.
     There’s a lot of peace here. Maybe I can borrow a little of it.

     Peace had come hard to him, ever since his adolescence. He’d tried to smother his disquiet with activity. His creativity and his gift for electronics had made him wealthy, but had done little to soothe his inner disquiet. Throughout his waking hours he remained acutely aware that he was a fugitive from his proper vocation.
     What’s done is done. The priesthood is no longer open to me. I’ll come to terms with it, or not. Maybe it’ll be easier now, away from people.
     He reached into his backpack and pulled out the paper bag, that held his lunch. He’d taken his first bite of a ham and cheese sandwich, lamenting that yet again he’d forgotten to add mustard, when the bear appeared.

#

     The bear was typical for the New York woods: about two hundred pounds and shaggy black with a long tan snout. It walked on all fours to the riverbank in no particular hurry. Andrew laid his sandwich in his lap and sat as still as he could manage, acutely aware that he had left the cabin without a weapon. Should the bear prove aggressive, he would be maimed if not killed.
     To his surprise, the bear merely sidled up to a spot beside him, just a few feet away, and lowered itself onto its haunches. It did not face him nor give another indication of having noticed him. It stared into the distance, as if it could see something beyond the river worthy of ursine contemplation.
     After about a minute Andrew cautiously picked up his sandwich and took a bite. The bear turned to look directly at him, and he froze.
     There was no suggestion of hostility in those brown eyes. The animal merely regarded him soberly. It was a gaze of the sort one might receive from a stranger in a tavern, the sort that silently inquires whether there’s any conversation to be had.
     If we were at the Black Grape, he might make a comment about politics or sports. Bears must not take much interest in those things. Not that I know much about them either.
     The bear’s gaze dipped to the sandwich in Andrew’s hand.
     Oh, right.
     He slowly extended his arm, intending to deposit it on the ground between them. The bear edged toward the movement, which caused him a frisson of fear. To his surprise, rather than snatch the sandwich out of his hand with its claws, the bear simply lowered its paws and waited.
     It was an invitation that could not be misinterpreted.
     Andrew laid the sandwich delicately on the ground before the bear. It reached for the gift with one paw, brought it to its snout and sniffed at it, then proceeded to nibble at it daintily. It took its time consuming the thing. When it had finished, it let its paws fall to its sides and gazed once more into the forest beyond the river. Andrew’s nerves began to subside.
     Probably for the best that I forgot the mustard.
     Perhaps ten minutes had elapsed when the bear rose and jumped into the river. Andrew recoiled from the splash the animal made, but otherwise remained as he was. Presently the bear clambered up the bank toward him, a large fish in its jaws. It laid the fish a couple of feet from where Andrew sat and resumed its seat. Its eyes were on Andrew. There was still no hint of aggression in its demeanor.
     Andrew strove to lock eyes with the bear.
     “For me?” he murmured.
     The bear met his gaze. It didn’t move.
     Andrew leaned forward and scooped the fish into his hands. The bear continued to watch him solemnly. He rose awkwardly, faced the bear, and bowed.
     The bear remained seated. It turned to gaze into the forest once again.
     Andrew departed.

#

     The fish was good. Though he lacked experience, Andrew succeeded in gutting and cleaning it. He fried it on his Franklin stove. Salted and peppered and with some corn alongside it, it made a tasty meal. From the cleaning of the fish through his washing-up after dinner, his thoughts remained on the exchange with the bear. He strove unsuccessfully to fit it into some familiar model of animal behavior.
     It defied understanding. Bears are predators. Even the relatively peaceable Northeastern black bear, the subspecies most common in New York’s forests, could not have been expected to wait for Andrew to surrender his sandwich willingly. It would have viewed it as as something to be taken from him willy-nilly. Resistance would have brought an attack on Andrew’s person.
     The bear’s gift of the fish made the whole business incomprehensible. Predators simply didn’t do such things. Surrendering freshly harvested food to another predator would express submission. A male bear, an apex land predator and a member of the most solitary of all predatory species, would never surrender food to another bear. They’d fight to the death first.
     Yet it had happened just that way. Entirely without violence, other than the bear’s capture of the fish.
     Maybe it was a sport. An exception to its species. There are exceptions among humans, so why not among bears?
     Because this is the wild, idiot. Pacifist bears wouldn’t last long among others of their kind. Probably not even long enough to reproduce.
     Still, it happened. I was there. I may go crazy after a few years living here, but I’m not crazy yet.

     Andrew knew himself to be a sport. Brilliant, from his youth deeply religious, and solitary by choice. Entirely uninterested in the things that made other men’s eyes light and glands pulse. Even his friend and colleague Louis, a polymathic genius, a world-class athlete, and a tower of rectitude, shared more with the common run of men than he did.
     Well, I probably won’t reproduce either.
     He put it aside for another time and dried the last of the dishes. Once his hands were dry and the dishes and utensils were back in the cupboard, he seated himself in his armchair, recorded the events of the day in his journal, then picked up the book he’d been reading and read until he fell asleep in his chair.

#

     Two days elapsed without incident. Andrew ate, slept, read, wrote in his journal, and ambled around the forest near to his cabin. The fright he’d taken from the approach of the bear had taught him always to take a rifle with him, though he was still lax about having it immediately to hand. He refrained from going back to the riverbank.
     Near noon on the third day after his encounter with the bear, he was building an outdoor fire, intending to heat water in which to wash his laundry and after that, himself. He’d rigged a grate to set over the wood from discarded fireplace andirons. The vessel for the water was a steel tub he’d salvaged from an old washing machine, easily large enough for the task.
     A brief rustling to the west of his cabin drew his attention. A black bear emerged from the thicket.
     Andrew’s rifle lay against the side of the cabin, more than thirty feet away. The bear was closer than that.
     It held a fish in its jaws.
     The same bear?
     Andrew could not tell.
     He stood still as the animal approached. When it had closed to within about six feet, it halted, dropped the fish on the ground, retreated a few feet and sat, eyes fixed upon Andrew.
     What are we doing?
     He still had no idea. Yet it was plain what the bear expected of him. He held up a hand, palm toward the bear, and trotted into the cabin. He found the remains of the ham he’d been eating and weighed it in his hands. There was at least a pound of meat left.
     This should do.
     He returned to where the bear waited and stopped a few feet away as the bear had. He lowered himself to one knee, laid the ham on the ground next to the fish, straightened and stepped back.
     The bear watched, unmoving.
     “For you,” Andrew murmured.
     The bear seemed to understand. It approached, sniffed at the ham, and closed its eyes briefly. Andrew waited.
     A few seconds later the bear straightened and shuffled toward the cabin. It made directly for the rifle Andrew had left there. It sniffed at the weapon, turned toward Andrew, and rose onto its hind legs.
     Andrew felt a fresh thrill of fear.
     The bear did not attack. It held its paws out to its sides, claws plainly visible, and looked directly into Andrew’s eyes. After a moment, its head moved slowly up and down. Twice.
     Unsure of what he was saying by doing so, Andrew nodded back.
     The bear dropped back onto all fours, ambled back to the paired gifts, and took the ham in its jaws. It regarded Andrew once more briefly before dashing back into the forest.
     Andrew felt all his muscles soften at once. It took him some time to master himself. Presently he picked up the fish and his rifle and returned to the cabin.

#

     Rachel debarked from her car as Andrew stepped through the cabin door. He spread his arms as she approached, and they embraced.
     “I see you were serious about living here,” she said.
     Andrew grinned. “What’s the giveaway?”
     She nodded toward the large pile of wood Andrew had cut into stove lengths. “That must have taken you a while.”
     He nodded. “Gave me a few blisters, too.”
     “Think it’s enough for an Onteora winter?”
     “I think so. That’s a bit more than three cords, and the cabin isn’t all that big. Besides, I can always cut more. There are a lot of dead trees out there.”
     She hugged him again and kissed him, then stepped back and regarded him soberly.
     “You’re looking good, Drew,” she said. “You’ve gained weight in the chest and shoulders.”
     “Yeah. Chalk it up to a lot of exercise and a protein-heavy diet.”
     “It’s deliberate, then?”
     “Very much so.” He waved toward the interior of the cabin. “Come on in. I’ll put up water for tea.”
     “Hang on a sec, I brought something for later.” She trotted back to her car, extracted a bottle of Dry Riesling, and presented it to him.
     “I doubt you see much of this in here.”
     He chuckled and took it from her. “Right you are. The wildlife prefers Chardonnay. Come on in.”
     They were seated at his dinette table over mugs of hot tea before their conversation resumed.
     “How’s Devin?” he said.
     “I can’t really say, Drew.” She sipped at her tea. “He keeps to himself even more than before Mom died. I’ve talked to him a few times, but he doesn’t say much. At least not about himself.”
     “Did you tell him you were headed up this way?”
     She nodded.
     “And?”
     “He didn’t react.”
     Andrew grunted.
     “Don’t expect too much of him, Drew. He’s better off not having a lot of contact with either of us.”
     “I suppose. Still, do you think we might be able to get him here for a family dinner next July fifteenth?”
     Her eyes narrowed. “Why that date?”
     His face twitched. “I shouldn’t call it a celebration, but… it’s for a celebration. That’s the day we were finally liberated from our tormentors. Don’t you think that’s a good enough reason?”
     She studied him for a long moment.
     “Yes,” she said at last. “I suppose now that both of them are dead and buried, it’s safe to think of them as what they really were. No more need to pretend we miss them or mourn their loss.”
     “Then it’s on,” he said. “I’ll make preparations.” He rose, stoked the fire in the fireplace, and returned to his seat. They passed an interval in silence.
     The two episodes with the bear rose to the front of his thoughts.
     I can tell her. Anyway, I ought to tell someone, and she’s close to my only choice. Maybe she’ll make sense of it.
     He hunched forward, folded his hands and laid them in his lap, and grinned at his sister.
     “Want to hear a weird story, sis?”
     Her expression became acute. She smiled.
     “Let’s have it, Drew.”
     And he told her.

#

     Rachel nodded as he ran down.
     “How long ago, Drew?”
     “About two months. Shortly after I moved here. I’ve been trying to make sense out of it ever since.”
     She frowned. “You have?”
     “Oh yeah. Bears are top of the land food chain. They take what they want. And they certainly don’t surrender food to other animals. Not even to other bears. Not without a fight.”
     “Hm.” She pursed her lips. “It makes perfect sense to me.”
     He peered at her. “It does?”
     “Oh yes. I’m surprised it isn’t clear to you, but then you’ve never been much for social stuff.”
     “Well,” he said, “do you plan to enlighten me?”
     She grinned wickedly.
     “Rach!”
     “Oh, all right.” She sat back. “I’ll tell you a story.”
     She closed her eyes and steepled her fingers before her.
     “Once upon a time,” she said, “there was a traveler who was looking for a home. He’d never had a true home, and he’d looked for a long while for a place where he might make one. He hoped for privacy, and peace, and if he were to have neighbors, that they would accept him for what he was rather than insist that he become something else.
     “After a long and tiring search, he stumbled upon a place that looked favorable. It promised privacy and peace. Since it looked as if there would be a comfortable amount of space around him, he decided to settle and take his chances.
     “It didn’t occur to him that the place he’d chosen might already have tenants. He couldn’t have imagined that they’d regard him as a guest in their home. But that’s the way it was. And one day, one of the neighbors looked him up and clued him in.
     “The traveler was momentarily confused. For a while he had no idea what was going on. But the neighbor—more of a representative of the district, really—gave him enough of a hint that he got the message. And as has always been the custom when one visits another’s home, he presented the neighbor with a guest gift. Food, the offering that says I wish you well in the universal language.
     “The neighbor accepted the gift and offered the traveler a matching gift: food the neighbor himself had prepared. It was about like the traveler had gone to dinner at someone else’s house, except for the absence of a table, plates, and silverware. The traveler accepted the gift, and he and the neighbor parted on good terms. The traveler continued to make the place into a home, the home he’d sought lifelong.
     “Three days later, in keeping with the prevailing custom in the neighborhood, the neighbor came to the traveler’s house with a gift of food. The traveler did as the neighbor had done: he reciprocated with food he had prepared. The two exchanged gifts and parted once more, and the traveler knew by those signs that he had been accepted into the neighborhood. He’d become a neighbor himself. And so his residency in his new home, the home he had sought for so long, began at last.”
     She opened her eyes and smiled. Andrew sat dumbfounded.
     “The bear was the… welcome wagon?”
     “No! Not at all, Drew. You’d entered his home. Without his invitation at that, though it appears he was willing to let you get away with it. As long as you followed the rest of the guest customs before making yourself too comfortable.” She slid forward on her seat. “Do you know the word ‘propitiate?’”
     “Of course.”
     “That’s the point of a guest gift. You’re propitiating the host, letting him know that you come in peace and friendship. A robber or a raider wouldn’t do that. He’d plunder the place, take whatever he wanted and use as much violence to do so as he needed.”
     “Oh.” In that moment Andrew MacLachlan could actually feel his mind expanding. “And the second time, when the bear brought a fish here?”
     “Same thing, Drew. Plus an acknowledgement that you’d made a home here and are now a resident of the community.”
     “I get it,” he murmured. “I get it! But… what about the bit with the rifle?”
     “The way you described it,” Rachel said, “sounded like that was one predator accepting another on equal terms. Also, I think that bear might have been putting you on notice. Telling you to use your claws judiciously, maybe. And maybe he was giving you a friendly warning that it’s not all sweetness and light here. A reminder that even the nicest neighborhood can have a few bad apples in it.”
     So I should keep it with me. That way I maintain my status as someone dangerous enough to be respected, and always ready to do what I must. For the neighborhood.
     “And I used to think I was a bright guy,” he muttered.
     “Oh, you are,” she said. “About technical stuff. But you might want to leave the people stuff to Devin and me.”
     “Yeah.” A laugh burst from him, unbidden. “Well, welcome to the neighborhood, sis.”
     “Just visiting,” she said. “But congratulations on having found your home,” she replied.
     “Think so?”
     “I know so.” She stood and waved in a gesture that clearly meant to encompass the forest beyond them. “The area’s certainly nice enough, but it did lack something before you got here.”
     “Hm? What?”
     She smiled.
     “A chapel,” she said. “And a priest.”
     He closed his eyes and breathed deeply.
     “Okay,” he said at last. He rose and stretched. “Join me for dinner?”
     “Sure. As long it’s not something you shot.”
     He chuckled. “I was going to take you to the diner. It’s that or eat from cans.”
     “The diner will do.”
     He offered her his arm, and she took it.
     “The neighborhood could use a few more restaurants,” he said.
     “Give it time.” She handed him the keys to her car. “You drive.”

==<O>==

Copyright © 2024 Francis W. Porretto. All Rights Reserved Worldwide.

Long Walks

     “Powerful minds tend to complete their own investigations, once they’ve been given a reason to investigate at all.” – Pope Clement XV

     Relax, relax. Pope Francis hasn’t departed this life without you hearing about it, you news junkie, you. Clement XV is a character in one of my novels: the first American to be elevated to the Throne of Saint Peter. But he has a lot to say – no more citations here; read the BLEEP!ing book – and the above is a choice specimen of his wisdom.

     (I am truly blessed to have such intelligent, insightful, articulate characters writing my books. Can’t imagine what I’d do without them. Yet there are carpers who ask “When are you going to write something about ordinary people, huh?” Well, you can’t please everyone, and only a fool would try.)

     Every now and then, a figure prominent for huge secular achievements makes some news with his thoughts about religion or the supernatural. Most such emissions are pedestrian at best; celebrities rarely have anything of substance to say about such things, and most business leaders are too absorbed by business matters to spend time orating about religion and spirituality. But as he is in more ways than this one, Elon Musk is an exception to the pattern:

     For all of his pursuits, Musk isn’t generally thought of as theologian.
     With the Tesla and SpaceX chief executive’s recent political transformation, however, we are increasingly seeing Musk invoke religion as he discusses his worldviews on topics ranging from parenthood to freedom of speech.
     He has talked about his core beliefs several times this summer, including this past week when describing how he defines empathy and its place in governing.
     […]
     In 2022, a spiritual side began to emerge publicly as he acquired Twitter-turned-X. He turned more political, airing worries about liberal policies becoming too extreme.
     “A new philosophy of the future is needed,” Musk tweeted that summer. “I believe it should be curiosity about the Universe—expand humanity to become a multiplanet, then interstellar, species to see what’s out there.”
     A couple of minutes later, he followed up: “This is compatible with existing religions—surely God would want us to see Creation?”
     […]
     “While I’m not a particularly religious person,” Musk said, “I do believe that the teachings of Jesus are good and wise.”

     “Not a particularly religious person” covers a whole lot of people: by my lights, just about everyone not in Holy Orders (and quite a few subject to them). But that’s to the side. What I have in mind at the moment is expressed in the citation at the top of this piece.

     Once an authentically smart man starts thinking seriously about Christianity, there are only two places he can arrive:

  1. Jesus of Nazareth was a nice guy who said a lot of nice things, but that’s all there is to it.
  2. Jesus of Nazareth was what He claimed to be: the Son of God, with divine authority to pronounce a new and eternal Covenant between God and Man.

     The latter destination appears to prevail, at least among the smart men I’ve known – and that’s a pretty large collection, Gentle Reader.

     The thing to remember about smart people is that you mustn’t preach to them. You mustn’t press your case on them, no matter how important you believe your message to be. They react badly to it. I certainly did. Not only can they “complete their own investigations;” given a morsel or two of evidence, they most certainly will. It’s in the nature of the superior intellect.

     The route to acceptance of the Christian faith has been described as a journey. It has its mile markers, its roadside attractions, and its byways. The way is also stippled with seductive wrong turnings; no small number of inquirers have stumbled into one or another of those. But the key to the journey is that most of the way, one must walk alone. Companions, no matter how well-meaning, are a distraction from what really matters: the evidence and its implications.

     The way is forked. It’s entirely possible to walk its whole length and take the “Jesus was a nice guy but that’s all” turn-off. That does require dismissing a lot of evidence, but as I’ve written before, there’s always an alternate explanation for any irreproducible event. But smart men are aware of the laws of probability. As I wrote many years ago:

     The key narratives were almost two millennia old. They confirmed one another, but no non-Christian source confirmed them in their totality. They spoke of suspensions of the natural law — miracles — of a kind never before attributed to any figure. If they were true, that Figure had to stand above Man in the order of things. If it were so, He could not have been a temporal, goal-driven creature, for He had no agenda of His own. He traveled, taught, healed, suffered, died…and rose from the dead.
     Insight came upon him in a flash of blinding purity.
     Of course no non-Christian source would fully confirm the Gospels. Anyone who wrote objectively of the miracles, Passion, and Resurrection of Christ, reporting them as observed, well-testified facts, would have to be a Christian. He couldn’t do so otherwise. So the lack of non-Christian confirmations means nothing.
     It could all be true. It can’t be disproved. All it requires is that I allow that there might be a God — a Being above and apart from temporal reality, to which temporal reality is subject. There could be. That can’t be disproved either.
     Men went to horrible deaths rather than renounce it. Many men.

     Let the smart man walk the way by himself. Once his feet are on the path, he’ll reach the end one way or another.

     May God bless and keep you all.

Diseases

     Thanks for the two days of rest, Gentle Reader. I needed them more than I can say. Now back to the show.

***

     First, let’s have a colorizing quote. There have been few plaints more widely shared than this one, from Paddy Chayefsky’s script for Network:

     I don’t have to tell you things are bad. Everybody knows things are bad. It’s a depression. Everybody’s out of work or scared of losing their job. The dollar buys a nickel’s worth. Banks are going bust. Shopkeepers keep a gun under the counter. Punks are running wild in the street and there’s nobody anywhere who seems to know what to do, and there’s no end to it. We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat, and we sit watching our TVs while some local newscaster tells us that today we had fifteen homicides and sixty-three violent crimes, as if that’s the way it’s supposed to be.

     We know things are bad — worse than bad. They’re crazy. It’s like everything everywhere is going crazy, so we don’t go out anymore. We sit in the house, and slowly the world we are living in is getting smaller, and all we say is: ‘Please, at least leave us alone in our living rooms. Let me have my toaster and my TV and my steel-belted radials and I won’t say anything. Just leave us alone.’

     That movie is forty-eight years old, yet its central theme, expressed above by maverick newsman Howard Beale, is as fresh as the morning dew: Things are bad. Not only that, they’re getting worse, and private American citizens feel powerless to do anything about it.

     Would anyone care to dissent?

***

     John Whitehead can be a bit screechy at times, but he has things to say, and he doesn’t mince words:

     “We the people” have become the new, permanent underclass in America.
     We’re being forced to shell out money for endless wars that are bleeding us dry, money for surveillance systems to track our movements, money to further militarize our already militarized police, money to allow the government to raid our homes and bank accounts, money to fund schools where our kids learn nothing about freedom and everything about how to comply, and on and on.
     This is no way of life.
     It’s tempting to say that there’s little we can do about it, except that’s not quite accurate.
     There are a few things we can do: demand transparency, reject cronyism and graft, insist on fair pricing and honest accounting methods, call a halt to incentive-driven government programs that prioritize profits over people, but it will require that “we the people” stop playing politics and stand united against the politicians and corporate interests who have turned our government and economy into a pay-to-play exercise in fascism.

     The whole piece is eminently worth your time. I quoted the segment above for its tone, and as a demonstrator for how an intelligent, passionate writer whose perceptions of things are entirely accurate can nevertheless miss the point.

     Whitehead’s key question is “Who Owns America?” It’s a good one. There are some 330 million of us at this time, and most of us “own” a little something. But “ownership” in the original sense has largely been destroyed. NB: Those will be the last “scare quotes.” I’m going to try to avoid them from this point forward, as I’m tired of replacing the caps on those keys.

     For example, I own a house and grounds… subject to extortionate property taxes for which I get nothing in return. I own two cars… neither of which I can drive without first complying with government licensing, registration, and inspection rules, all of which come with fees. I have a decent fund of savings… but God help me if I should try to spend any of it; the sales taxes in my corner of the country are ruinous. You might be able to say the same things.

     So there’s some reason for Americans to feel hedged in by the Omnipotent State. But few of us contemplate how it came to be this way.

     Among Whitehead’s takes on our current malaise are several j’accuses aimed at big business. As I’ve already extracted a large quote, I’ll simply recommend that you read the rest of his essay for yourselves. You’ll find the thrusts at large corporations, both foreign and domestic, quite easily. Whitehead’s statements of observable fact are quite accurate.

     Whitehead also cites identity politics as a factor in our deterioration. There’s no question that this is a pernicious influence. The collectivization of virtually everything according to racial, religious, and sexual identities is just as destructive to social peace as the collectivization of production and commerce is to prosperity and security. However, politicians love it; it greatly simplifies their vote-buying sprees.

     You might be asking yourself “If Fran agrees with Whitehead on all of that, what is it he disagrees with?” And you’re right to do so. The time for that has come.

     None of the political, economic, or social diseases enumerated in Whitehead’s essay can be fought directly. A frontal assault on most of them is impossible. Even when it’s possible, the battle can’t be won that way. The reason is simple: they are not primaries but resultants. They came about because of bad decisions made long ago about things far more fundamental.

     Think of the evil phenomena discussed in Whitehead’s essay as the symptoms of a disease, rather than as the disease itself. Good physicians don’t treat symptoms; they strive to identify the causative agent, the bacillus, virus, or allergen that brought it about, and to attack that directly. Once the causative agent has been vanquished, the symptoms will gradually disappear.

***

     I shan’t go deeper just now. (Rest assured: I will.) The point of this piece is to pose a question. I could ask it thus:

What fundamental errors made those maladies possible?

     …but after reflection, I think it better put thus:

What fundamental errors made those maladies inevitable?

     More anon.

Evil does exist. Satan never stops.

That’s what went through my head when I read this news report.

A 25-year-old mother in Michigan and her 32-year-old boyfriend have been arrested and accused of torturing and killing her 6-year-old son, who was kept in a pen, stapled to the wall, and repeatedly shot with a BB gun, among other things.

I won’t go into everything that poor boy went through before he died. You can read it if you want to.

Why do people do things like this? Looking at the mug shots I think that drugs were a big part of it. But in the end, people do evil things because people, unless they’re taught to be otherwise, are just not very nice. Mankind is a fallen creature, and entire civilizations have tried to redeem us, without success. There’s been one single thing that has worked in all of the history of the world to try to improve on man’s nature, and that success is only partial: CHRISTIANITY.

I say partial success because Christianity is made from humanity, and I’ll refer you back to that whole mankind being fallen thing.

I feel bad for the kid. And I feel bad about a society where these sorts of things seem to happen more and more. I don’t have any real deep thoughts about it. Just… wanted to express myself a bit.

Oh, and buy more ammo.

His Mistake Was In Pleading Guilty

Here is what he allegedly gained from his admission of guilt. The judge arbitrarily decided to reduce his sentence from 30 months to 20 months “because you pleaded guilty to this serious crime.”

Three Facebook posts criticizing UK policy is now viewed as a serious crime in a country where voter awareness of the consequences of government policy is extremely important at upcoming elections.

One should never plead guilty to a law that makes criticism of government policies a crime.

One pleads not guilty on the grounds that any law silencing dissent is a violation of basic human rights and thereby illegitimate.

Going further, it also makes a mockery of this court that rules over subjects allegedly free to choose their representatives in government. One cannot make such choices freely when one is not free to discuss the consequences of current law.

I must admit to being inspired for this line of thinking by my vague recollection of Hank Reardon’s commentary to the kangaroo court in Ayn Rand’s Atlas Shrugged. It would take courage to mount such a counter-attack. It might be nigh impossible to find an attorney who has the balls to plea like this before any court.

But that is the terrible cross-roads we have laxly permitted our formerly liberal Western world to regress back to.

(Cross posted at Crusader Rabbit 2 days ago because it took me this long to figure out how to embed tweets in our version of Word Press.)

Load more